Sunday, October 2, 2011

Comparing Adam Smith, Steve Jobs, and Herb Chambers (2)

Patrick Walsh wrote:
Adam Smith, Steve Jobs, and Herb Chambers have proven to be revolutionaries of their time through their drive, persistence, and by striving for nothing less than their own respective ideas of "perfection."  It is made clear through each article that each self-made-man achieved their status and fame through this idea that perfection is the only acceptable result.  Adam Smith believed that “the driving force of individual self-help and self-improvement…would win through, whatever the obstacles.”  Smith stood strongly for his progressive principles because he believed that wealth derives from “the uniform, constant, and uninterrupted effort of every man to better his conditions.”  Although Smith lived two centuries ago, and it is difficult to understand the common ideas and beliefs of society at that time, it is clear that Smith faced an uphill battle to set his principles into motion.  However, as we look back on Smith’s ideas, it is hard to imagine a world where the common man does not try to put himself in optimal opportunities to better himself.  Therefore, Smith’s basic principles: free trade, putting consumers before producers, and encouraging competition were all radical, but vital principles that now make up the building blocks of the world that we live in today.
Steve Jobs - co-founder, chairman, and former chief executive of Apple Inc. – achieved his success in a similar fashion to that of Adam Smith, although slightly more radical.  By striving for nothing short of perfection, Jobs’ Apple Inc. is the second most valuable company in the world, behind only ExxonMobil.  The perfection that Jobs craved demanded a lot of risk-taking, and as a result, Jobs became known for his risky behavior.  Early on in his career, Jobs became known as a great visionary and promoter, but was not respected as a businessman.  This was unacceptable to Jobs.  Instead of just giving into the pressure that he faced, Jobs embraced the criticism and continued to make very risky decisions.  For example, after releasing the iPod, the iPhone came along years later.  However, by releasing the iPhone, he effectively “cannibalized” the iPod, as the capabilities of the iPod were all available on the iPhone.  Furthermore, Jobs also created iTunes, despite being told by skeptics that it would generate very little profit.  Going with his gut instinct, Jobs received all potential income related to all Apple products, because the “apps” that were the focal point for the iPhone were all sold through iTunes.  Therefore, after the sale of the product itself, Jobs was not simply done with the consumer; but rather, the consumer had only begun purchases with Apple, as everything that went into the product was only sold on iTunes.  These critical decisions that Jobs made show that he will strive for nothing short of perfection, and he will always go the extra step in order to ensure that he is achieving perfection.
Finally, Herb Chambers, the poster-boy for rags-to-riches success, generated all of his wealth by going the extra step, and trying to be perfect in every aspect of his life.  Chambers states, “I’m not happy unless it’s perfect.”  This particular scene, from when Chambers was only thirteen years old, shows his mentality: To pay his rent when he was thirteen, he collected shopping carts in the Stop & Shop parking lot.  He said, “It was almost a game with me, to see how few carriages I could have sitting out in the parking lot.  The ultimate goal: no carriages out there that somebody didn’t have their hands on.”  Both Chambers and Jobs alike, seem to be known for their endless drive for perfection, and their close friends and family believe that although being a positive for business, it eats away at their health and mental stability in their own personal lives.  By seeking flawlessness and success in literally every situation, Chambers has found himself in the position he is in today.  Another scene that is highlighted in the article is one in which Chambers entered a building to sell his copy machine supplies to a hard-nosed businessman, who initially kicks Chambers’ briefcase down the stairs and essentially tells him to get lost.  Chambers described his thought process, “This is a moment I have to win,” he said to himself, “You don’t give in.”  Chambers then proceeded to march back up the stairs and convinced the same man to buy his supplies.  Ironically, the man offered Chambers and job, which he declined.  Clearly, the success of Chambers, Jobs, and Smith came from a focus on the small details and an unending strive for perfection that essentially forces each of them to not stop until they have achieved such perfection.

3 comments:

  1. Ryan Santos wrote: Adam Smith, Herb Chambers, and Steve Jobs are all geniuses in the world of business. The three of them are similar because of their unique competitive personality. Adam Smith was not necessarily a business owner, he was a philosopher, but he believed the market economy should not be regulated by the government because there needed to be competition among businesses. He thought his theory would provide for the best government because it allowed for most consumers to have jobs. He also promoted competition because there would not be one company dominating the economy and raising prices. Even though Adam Smith lived a long time ago, his theories proved to be completely true to this day.
    Herb Chambers was a Massachusetts born native who grew up working for business after business trying to be the best that he could be. For instance, when he worked repairing copy machines, he aspired to be the best he could be at his job. When he was promoted to a salesman, he even took a class to interact with people better because he was very shy. Herb believed that everything needed to be “perfect” for success. This attention to detail allowed him to accomplish his goals in being the best at what he does.
    Steve Jobs is not only a genius, but a huge risk taker. He believed that to be successful at what he does, he needed to take big risks to get big rewards. Steve Jobs needed to take risks because Apple was nearly bankrupt after repeated unsuccessful products. Steve’s aggressive nature towards his employees pushed them to really design the best products starting with the iPod. His nature to create the best product in today’s technological world allowed for the iphone, iTunes store, and ipad to all become top selling items. Apple surpassed Microsoft in value of the company based on Steve Jobs’ big risks. A fierce competitive nature is crucial to success in today’s business world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How are these three people: a philosopher, technological visionary, and entrepreneur similar? Write a three paragraph commentary here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the words of the great Charlie Sheen these men are “winning”, and it is the end result of all that they do. No matter what the business venture be if it is one they all have the mentality to strive and make a lasting impact on the study of economics and the overall model of how to be successful in whatever one pursues. The main core of all their similarities that have been almost the basis of all that Jobs, and Chambers have done has been Adams Smith’s idea that, “It was brought about by the restoration of markets, by the introduction of competition, by giving people room to innovate and to create, and to keep a large measure of the fruits of their efforts. It was brought about by bringing union leaders under the control of their members, and by removing much of the protection which government had given them against the due process of law. It was brought about by ending subsidies and supports, and placing industries under the competitive pressures of the private sector.”
    Herb Chambers, a self made billionaire, essentially followed these steps set by Adam Smith who has a lasting effect on the world today. Markets, Chambers was involved is many of them whether it be when he worked at stop and shop, or his parents bar, or A-Copy America, or to his 46 car dealerships. Chambers moved on in all of these with the help of competition especially when he started A-Copy America. While he worked for the company that sold parts for copiers he became the top seller in the company and was promoted rapidly, an example of a competition for a job, and also when he started his own company he knew it would be difficult but he knew he could do it for himself not for someone else. Fruits of one’s efforts, the ultimate phrase for Chamber’s, he is completely self made starting when he had to pay rent to his mother until he moved on from job to job eventually find his niche in his 46 car dealerships. Similar to all that Chamber’s has done Job’s has done. The market for all Apple products have been very up and down throughout the career of Steve Job’s, including many products that have been busts and then followed up by hits, then even ranging to having to cannibalize one’s own product. Although competition has not been as big a factor in the career of Steve Job’s adversity has and he has used this to create great products that increase in quality from the generation preceding it.
    Essentially the three are very common. Although it may seem that Smith only lays the foundation for the other two, he actually still “exists” in every marketplace today especially these two because they use essentially his business model to run their companies and delearships.

    ReplyDelete